Michael Altman
Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer
With over 20 years of experience, Michael understands that many people involved in an automobile accident don’t know where or how to begin the personal injury claim process. The day of the accident and the first few days after the accident are confusing and insurance companies do little to nothing to help the accident victims. In fact, often times insurance companies try to get victims to settle quickly and close their claim. This is NOT in your best interest.
Michael’s years of experience and success allow him to provide a personal approach where clients are able to talk directly to him about their case and have all of their questions answered by a top-rated attorney.
Michael and his staff are here to help immediately and assist in everything from the initial claim reporting, property damage repairs, and getting a great settlement for your injury claim. We advise clients of their rights and all applicable insurance policies and coverages that will help you during a difficult time in your life.
MIKE JACOBSON
Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer
EDUCATION
MEMBERSHIPS
American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)
Washington State Association for Justice
BAR ADMISSIONS
US District Court, Western District of Washington
US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Arbitrator – King County Superior Court
Practitioner of Foreign Law – The Law Society of British Columbia
Janelle Bailey
Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer
Janelle has successfully taken on cases against some of the largest insurance companies in the nation. She has obtained 6 and 7 figures outcomes for her clients against insurance companies, trucking companies, and premises liability parties. She is a member of the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum, open only to attorneys with a history of multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements. She has repeatedly been named as a Top 40 under 40 trial attorney by the National Trial Lawyers, an invitation-only organization composed of premier trial lawyers.
Upon receiving her law degree from the University of Missouri – Kansas City School of Law Janelle joined the Jackson County Prosecutor’s office as an Assistant Prosecuting Attorney. As an Assistant Prosecutor Janelle was in the courtroom almost every day handling hundreds of cases and perfecting her trial skills. Janelle went on to work at two prestigious law firms utilizing her Physics background as a patent attorney. After years of working in the corporate sector, Janelle established Washington Injury Law to solely focus on helping people who have been injured.
John W Ladenburg, Jr.
Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer
John W. Ladenburg, Jr. has dedicated his career to personal injury law. Since 1996, John has tirelessly represented his clients in all aspects of the injury claim process. John consistently obtains outstanding results for victims of injuries.
John was born in Spokane, Washington three and a half years before Erik while his father was attending Gonzaga University, and was raised in Tacoma, Washington.
- After graduating law school, John worked at Preston Gates & Ellis in Spokane, Washington. Upon returning to Tacoma in December, 1996, John was an associate at Burgess Fitzer, P.S. where he practiced civil litigation primarily defending governmental entities and individuals in personal injury, employment and civil rights actions.
- In early 2003, John joined Erik at Ladenburg Law, PLLC. Since joining Ladenburg Law, John has focused his practice primarily on representing injured victims. He has handled cases involving automobile collisions, pedestrians, premise liability, and worksite injuries. John has also represented employees who have been the subject of discrimination, harassment and retaliation.
- John has been a member of the Washington State Bar Association since 1996 and a member of the Washington State Association of Justice (formerly Washington State Trial Lawyers Association) since 2003. He has been a member of the Tacoma Pierce County Bar Association since 1997 and a member of the Honorable Robert J. Bryan American Inn of Court since 2000. He is admitted to practice in Washington State Courts, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Phil Weinberg
Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer
Being charged with a criminal offense is serious matter. The consequences of a criminal conviction — no matter how seemingly minor — can be serious and long lasting. Generally, no one is looking out for your legal interests in a criminal case except your defense attorney. Your defense attorney’s entire job is to safeguard your interests and protect you from the overwhelming power of the government that is investigating and prosecuting you. I have been told many times that I saved people from very tough legal dilemmas and did “a stunning job” defending them. I continuously research the latest cases, legal treatises, scientific literature, and articles on the subject of drunk driving defense, allowing me to be on the cutting edge of Assault and DV (Domestic Violence) and DUI defense at all times. Most of my practice primarily focusses on defending those accused of Domestic Violence Assault charges.
Also, and very importantly, I take a holistic approach to every client, as each person and their case and history is different and unique, and as every client has different legal goals. I know how to read a police report to find issues to help your case, and how to best present you and your case in court and to the prosecutor.
I have been practicing law in the Seattle-Everett-Tacoma area since 1986, with over 26 years of experience in criminal defense and DUI defense. I am a member in good standing with the Washington State Bar Association and belong to several professional associations. I have also been a member of the Washington State Trial Lawyers Association, Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers the American Trial Lawyers Association, the American Bar Association and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers…
Kirk Bernard
Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer
Kirk Bernard has been a civil litigator in Washington & California for over 30 years, specializing in personal injury cases representing accident victims. For the past 39 years, Kirk has not stopped giving everything he has in the pursuit of justice.
Kirk Bernard received his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of California at Santa Barbara. Following graduation from Law School in 1981, Kirk quickly became a licensed personal injury attorney. Since then, he has dedicated himself to serving his community by giving victims a chance to fight back.
Kirk has represented accident victims on his own as well as partnering with other notable attorneys to fight major corporations. As a result of his relentless pursuit of justice, he has helped his clients recover millions of dollars. Kirk is a successful personal injury lawyer with a distinguished career who subsequently believes in community support. Due to his legal success, Kirk is able to give back to his community in a proactive and caring way.
His record shows that difficult fights don’t scare him because he is willing to fight for what is right. As long as you have someone like Kirk standing by your side, justice will be served.
Spencer Parr
Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer
Spencer Parr is admitted to practice law in the federal courts as well as the state of Washington. Before co-founding Washington Law Center, he served in the U.S. Army with Military Intelligence as an electronic warfare operator and Russian linguistics. Spencer earned a bachelors degree in Political Science and International Studies before attending and graduating from UCLA School of Law in 2004. After earning his education, he worked as a Managing Attorney and Department Head for one of the largest consumer law firms in Washington state. He has litigated major issues in the law, represented clients from coast to coast, and dedicated his professional life to assisting the injured and disabled.
Spencer practices primarily in the areas of Workers’ Compensation and Personal Injury matters including medical malpractice cases.
Spencer’s Personal Career Recoveries are over $150,000,000 on behalf of Personal Injury, Workers’ Compensation, and Social Security Disability recipients, including:
$25,500,000 – Workplace Injury Claim
Record setting lump sum settlement plus lifetime care and pension. Believed to be the largest recovery in its jurisdiction.
$2,177,000 – Industrial Injury Pension for a 51-Year Old Man who Suffered Physical and Mental Health Injuries
Injury pension paid at nearly $60,000 (inflation adjusting) per year for a client with significant physical and mental health injuries.
$1,900,000 – Injury Pension for Physical and Mental Health Impairments
Injury pension paid at nearly $60,000 per year for a client with significant physical and mental health impairments.
$1,886,000 – Industrial Injury Pension for a 53-Year Old Man who Suffered Physical and Mental Health Injuries
Injury pension paid at nearly $60,000 (inflation adjusting) per year for a client with significant physical and mental health injuries.
$1,825,000 – Industrial Injury Pension for a 38-Year Old Man who Suffered Physical and Mental Health Injuries
Injury pension paid at nearly $40,000 (inflation adjusting) per year for a client with significant physical and mental health injuries.
Derek Michael Smith
Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer
Derek brings more than 15 years of criminal law experience to the Tacoma attorney team of Smith and White. His work as a prosecutor, judge, and defense attorney provide him valuable insight into Washington criminal defense law.
Derek tried hundreds of criminal defense cases, including in the state Court of Appeals and Washington State Supreme Court, as a prosecutor with the cities of Seattle and Kent. He’s worked on or negotiated more than 15,000 trial experience, Derek has taken more than 150 jury trials to a verdict.
Derek served as the head of the domestic violence unit for the City of Kent and supervised the misdemeanor unit before he left to go to Seattle. In Seattle he served in the DUI and misdemeanor trial unit. There he prosecuted notorious strip club owner and alleged mob boss Frank Colacurcio for sexual assault on a waitress in his strip club and twice convicted him. After serving in the trial unit, Derek became the vice and narcotics liaison for the Seattle City Attorney’s Office and received the Seattle Police Department Chief’s Award for his role in Operation Sobering Thought. He has also presided over thousands of cases as a judge pro tem in Federal Way, Pacific and Des Moines.
He graduated with honors from Seattle University School of Law in 1996.
Derek volunteers his time to local nonprofits including serving as president of the Tacoma Art Museum Activities Council in 2010 for the Tacoma Art Museum’s 75th Anniversary Gala. He is the current vice president of St. Mark’s Lutheran by the Narrows church council.
Who is responsible for drug recalls?
Drug recalls are a critical aspect of public health protection, ensuring that unsafe or defective medications are swiftly removed from the market to prevent harm to patients. When a drug is found to be potentially dangerous, contaminated, mislabeled, or otherwise not in compliance with regulatory standards, a recall may be initiated. But who bears the responsibility for initiating, managing, and overseeing these recalls? The answer involves a coordinated effort among manufacturers, regulatory authorities, and, in some cases, distributors and healthcare providers.
The Manufacturer: The First Line of Responsibility
The primary responsibility for drug recalls lies with the manufacturer or the marketing authorization holder (licensee). These entities are directly involved in the production, packaging, and distribution of pharmaceutical products and are thus best positioned to identify and address issues with their products.
Manufacturers are required by law in most countries to have robust quality control and pharmacovigilance systems in place. These systems are designed to detect problems such as contamination, incorrect labeling, or unexpected side effects. If a manufacturer discovers a problem-either through internal quality checks, consumer complaints, or reports from healthcare providers-they are obligated to assess the risk and, if necessary, initiate a recall.
Manufacturers must also have a recall plan ready, detailing how they will communicate with distributors, healthcare providers, regulators, and, if needed, the public. They are responsible for tracking the distribution of affected batches, retrieving the product from the market, and ensuring safe disposal or correction of the issue.
Regulatory Authorities: Oversight and Enforcement
While manufacturers are the first to act, regulatory authorities play a crucial oversight and enforcement role in drug recalls. Agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the UK, and the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) in India, among others, have the legal power to monitor drug safety and enforce recalls when necessary.
Regulatory agencies may become aware of potential drug issues through adverse event reporting systems, routine inspections, or whistleblower reports. If they determine that a drug poses a significant risk to public health, they can request or mandate a recall, even if the manufacturer has not acted voluntarily.
Once a recall is underway, regulators oversee the process to ensure it is effective and comprehensive. They may require the manufacturer to submit regular progress reports, conduct effectiveness checks, and provide evidence that the recalled product has been removed from all levels of the supply chain. In cases where the manufacturer fails to comply, regulatory authorities can impose penalties, suspend licenses, or take legal action.
Distributors, Wholesalers, and Healthcare Providers
The responsibility for drug recalls does not end with manufacturers and regulators. Distributors, wholesalers, pharmacies, and healthcare providers also play important roles in the recall process. When notified of a recall, these stakeholders must act quickly to remove the affected product from their shelves and inform patients who may have received the medication.
In some jurisdictions, distributors and importers are legally required to cooperate with recall efforts, maintain accurate records of product distribution, and assist in tracing and retrieving recalled products. Healthcare providers, especially those in hospitals and clinics, are responsible for identifying patients who may have been exposed to the recalled drug and advising them on appropriate actions.
The Recall Process: Step by Step
Detection of a Problem: Issues may be identified through internal quality checks, consumer complaints, adverse event reports, or regulatory inspections.
Risk Assessment: The manufacturer assesses the severity of the problem and consults with regulatory authorities to determine the appropriate recall classification (e.g., Class I, II, or III in the U.S., based on the level of risk).
Notification: The manufacturer notifies regulatory authorities, distributors, healthcare providers, and, if necessary, the public.
Product Removal: Affected products are removed from the market at all levels of the supply chain. The manufacturer coordinates the logistics of retrieval and safe disposal.
Regulatory Oversight: Authorities monitor the recall’s progress, require status reports, and may conduct effectiveness checks.
Follow-up: After the recall, the manufacturer investigates the root cause of the issue and implements corrective actions to prevent recurrence.
Legal and Ethical Implications
Drug recalls are not just a matter of regulatory compliance-they are also a moral and ethical obligation. Failure to act promptly and transparently can result in serious harm to patients, loss of public trust, and severe legal consequences for companies and individuals involved.
Regulatory agencies have the authority to impose fines, suspend or revoke licenses, and pursue criminal charges in cases of gross negligence or intentional wrongdoing. Companies with poor recall records may also face reputational damage and increased scrutiny of their future products.
Conclusion
In summary, the responsibility for drug recalls is a shared one, involving manufacturers, regulatory authorities, distributors, and healthcare providers. The manufacturer or licensee bears the initial and primary responsibility for detecting problems and initiating recalls, while regulatory authorities provide oversight, enforce compliance, and protect public health. Distributors and healthcare providers play supporting roles in ensuring that recalled products are swiftly removed from circulation and that patients are informed and protected.
Ultimately, effective drug recalls depend on timely action, transparent communication, and a commitment to patient safety from all parties involved.