More Filters

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer Maryland

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer Maryland

David M. Krum

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

David M. Krum cofounded Krum, Gergely & Oates, LLC, a full-service law firm, because he believes that people who are charged with crimes or traffic offenses or those involved in personal injury deserve to have a strong attorney fighting for their rights. From his firm’s offices in Rockville, Hyattsville and Fairfax, Mr. Krum represents clients throughout Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, and across the state of Maryland. In addition to criminal, traffic and personal injury matters, Mr. Krum handles medical malpractice and workers’ compensation matters for his clients.

After receiving dual bachelor’s degrees in Spanish and Physics from Wofford College in 2001, Mr. Krum pursued his legal education at the University of Baltimore School of Law and was awarded his Juris Doctorate in 2005. Prior to forming Krum, Gergely & Oates, LLC, Mr. Krum was a partner for 7 years at a large criminal, traffic and personal injury law firm in Silver Spring, Maryland.

Andrew Bederman

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Andy graduated from Case Western Reserve University Law School in Cleveland, Ohio in 1978. After law school, Andy was an associate at a personal injury law firm in Rockville, Maryland. Andy opened his own law office in 1982. In 1985, Andy and Roger Greenberg founded Greenberg & Bederman LLC, which is dedicated to protecting the rights of victims and consumers.

Andy was President of the Maryland Association for Justice (MAJ) from 1998 to 1999. He has served on the MAJ Board of Governors and has chaired many MAJ committees. He also served on the MAJ Political Action Committee for over fifteen (15) years.

Andy is a member of American Association for Justice (AAJ). He served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the AAJ Political Action Committee from 2015 to 2021.

Andy is also a member of the District of Columbia Trial Lawyers Association, the Virginia Trial Lawyers Association, the Maryland Bar Association and the DC Bar Association.

Andy has lectured on automobile accident cases and attorney marketing issues. He has appeared numerous times on local television and radio news broadcasts and he has been interviewed by many local newspapers. These news stories have concerned, among other things, Andy’s efforts to hold bar and restaurant owners civilly liable for injuries caused by patrons who are served too much alcohol and then permitted to drive.

Andy has frequently testified before the Maryland legislature regarding proposed legislation to help personal injury victims and consumers throughout the State of Maryland.

Roland B. Durocher

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Roland was born in Bozeman, and raised in and around Great Falls, Montana. After graduating as class valedictorian from Great Falls High, in 1988, he attended the University of Montana on a Presidential Scholarship. He graduated from the University with high honors, earning a degree in economics, in 1991. 

He then went on to law school at the University of Montana, during which time he worked both in a large law firm, and as an intern in the USDA legal department. Following his graduation in 1994, he returned to Great Falls to start a private practice. He joined the present firm in 1996. Roland is a successful trial attorney, and active member of the legal and civic communities. He is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates, an exclusive invitation only organization of plaintiff and defense trial lawyers consisting of roughly one-half of one percent of all attorneys in the nation. He is AV rated by Martindale-Hubble, and the recipient of the Robert P. Goff pro bono award and the Montana Trial Lawyers Association (MTLA) appellate advocacy award. He has a wife and three daughters. Roland and his family enjoy staying active outdoors, including hunting, fishing, boating and golfing.

Henry I. Greenberg

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Henry Greenberg earned his law degree from University of Baltimore Law School, Magna Cum Laude, in 1966. Following graduation, he worked as a Law Clerk to Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge William J. O’Donnell. Following his passing of the Bar Exam in 1966, he served as an Assistant City Solicitor for the City Of Baltimore for several years in their Trial Division. 

In 1971 he entered private practice specializing in litigating personal injury cases and criminal law defense in the Baltimore Metropolitan area and Eastern Shore, which continues to this day. He has been joined in his practice by his two sons and a female associate. His practice is now limited to serious personal injury and death caused by accident, product defect, nursing home neglect or medical negligence. He has been successful in obtaining jury verdicts and settlements in excess of $1,000,000 for numerous individuals who have been the victims of medical negligence, negligent drivers and manufacturers of defective products. He is a past Governor of The Maryland Trial Lawyers Association, where he served on many committees dedicated to providing justice to citizens of Maryland injured as a result of the negligence of others. As a Governor of the Maryland Trial Lawyers Association.

Rick Jaklitsch

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Rick Jaklitsch is a nationally acclaimed personal injury trial lawyer. The BIG DOG himself has seemingly won every possible legal award that relies on the vote of judges who have seen Rick in action, or lawyers who have opposed Rick in court. Rick was one of the youngest attorneys in the country when he was first honored by Martindale-Hubbell with their coveted “AV Preeminent” rating of Personal Injury Trial Lawyers.  

 That honor put Rick in the top 1% of lawyers nationwide, and he has won that prestigious recognition every year since 1993. Martindale-Hubbell calls this AV rating “the pinnacle of professional excellence earned through a strenuous peer review rating process. It is the highest possible peer review rating in both legal ability and ethical standards”.

Rick has been honored by Who’s Who In American Law for over thirty (30) years. He’s been listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers every year since 1995 and was one of the very first lawyers in the entire country to obtain a perfect 10.0 rating for legal ability by the online rating service of AVVO.com.

Brian S. Brown

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Brian S. Brown, one of the firm’s founding partners, as well as its Managing Member, has over thirty years of experience as a trial lawyer and focuses his practice on litigating nursing home abuse and medical malpractice cases.Brian has tried well over 100 tort cases and has obtained multiple multi-million dollar verdicts. Over his career, he has recovered more than $175 million for his clients, through both trial and settlement.Brian S. Brown, one of the firm’s founding partners, as well as its Managing Member, has over thirty years of experience as a trial lawyer and focuses his practice on litigating nursing home abuse and medical malpractice cases.

In 2022, Brian was named a Leader in Law Honoree by The Daily Record and the Maryland State Bar Association. In 2020, Brian was selected as “Trial Lawyer of the Year” by the MAJ. The MAJ Trial Lawyer of the Year Award is bestowed annually upon the Maryland trial lawyer or team of trial lawyers who made the greatest contribution to the public interest by trying or settling a case of precedential value – precedential either because it changed the law in a way that is beneficial to Marylanders or has, for other reasons, “sent a message” to those who might otherwise trample upon the rights of Maryland citizens. Brian has been named as a Super Lawyer, and he has been selected as a member of both the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum and the prestigious Litigation Counsel of America.

Mitchell Greenbergicon

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Mitchell is not only a legal warrior who fights for those facing criminal charges but he has also competed in martial arts throughout his life. He is also a national and world champion of Filipino stick fighting and, in 2018, he competed at the national World Eskrima Kali Arnis Federation championships where he won four gold medals, two silvers and one bronze.

While many pretend to understand the ideals of the law, Mitchell lives by them. His strength and honesty are prized by his criminal defense and workers’ compensation clients. He fights for them because justice demands it, and because they deserve it.

For those struggling with the vile injuries inflicted by negligence, Mitchell knows all too well their struggles. He fights for them because he has lived through their pains. His history as a four-time national champion and word champion in Filipino stick fighting means there is nothing that he has not recovered from. If you reach out to Mitchell, you will know the sympathetic ear of a champion dedicated to your recovery and your compensation.

Joshua A. Plaxen

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Joshua A. Plaxen joined Plaxen Adler Muncy, P.A. in December 2015, and became a partner in 2021. Prior to joining the firm, Joshua served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable William V. Tucker for the Circuit Court of Howard County from August 2012 through September 2013

During his time as a law clerk, Joshua contributed to judicial opinions, observed numerous trials for different types of legal matters, and developed an astute understanding of Maryland civil procedure. After clerking, Joshua worked for the University of Maryland, Baltimore where he drafted and negotiated Clinical Trial Agreements and Research Agreements with large, publicly traded companies and small startup companies.Joshua graduated from the University of Maryland, College Park in 2008 with a Bachelor’s Degree in Business, and graduated from the University of Baltimore School of Law in 2012 magna cum laude.

What is the reason for product recall?

Product recalls are an essential aspect of modern consumer safety, ensuring that potentially dangerous or defective products are swiftly removed from the market. A product recall occurs when a manufacturer, distributor, or regulatory agency requests the return, repair, or replacement of a product due to safety concerns, quality issues, or regulatory violations. Understanding the reasons behind product recalls is crucial for both businesses and consumers, as it highlights the importance of quality control, transparency, and consumer protection.


1. Safety Hazards and Defective Products

The most common reason for product recalls is the discovery of safety hazards or defects that could harm consumers. These hazards can arise from:

  • Design Defects: Flaws in the product’s design can make it inherently dangerous, even when manufactured correctly. For example, a car with a poorly designed fuel tank that is prone to catching fire in a collision may be recalled.

  • Manufacturing Defects: Errors during the production process can lead to products that do not meet safety standards. This might include faulty wiring in electrical appliances or improperly assembled parts in toys and vehicles.

  • Component Failures: Sometimes, a specific part or material used in the product fails, leading to potential harm. For instance, the widespread recall of Takata airbags was due to defective inflators that could explode and cause injury or death.

Case Example:

In 2020, Peloton recalled its Tread+ treadmills after reports of injuries and a child’s death, citing the risk of being pulled under the machine due to a design flaw.


2. Contamination

Contamination is a significant reason for recalls in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. Contaminants can include bacteria, viruses, foreign objects, or harmful chemicals. Common causes include:

  • Bacterial Contamination: Outbreaks of foodborne illnesses such as salmonella, listeria, or E. coli often lead to recalls of fresh produce, meats, dairy, and processed foods.

  • Chemical Contamination: The presence of pesticides, cleaning agents, or other toxic substances in food or drugs can prompt recalls.

  • Foreign Objects: Discovery of glass, metal, or plastic fragments in consumable products is a frequent reason for recall.

Case Example:

In 2015, Blue Bell Creameries recalled all of its ice cream products after listeria contamination was linked to several illnesses and deaths.


3. Incorrect or Misleading Labeling

Labels provide essential information about a product’s contents, usage, and safety. Incorrect, incomplete, or misleading labeling can result in serious health risks, especially for consumers with allergies or medical conditions. Recalls may be triggered by:

  • Undeclared Allergens: Food products that fail to disclose the presence of allergens like peanuts, gluten, or dairy can be life-threatening to sensitive individuals.

  • Incorrect Dosage Information: In pharmaceuticals, inaccurate instructions can lead to overdoses or ineffective treatment.

  • False Claims: Labels that make unsubstantiated health or safety claims can violate regulations and prompt recalls.

Case Example:

Numerous food recalls occur each year due to undeclared allergens, such as a snack labeled “nut-free” that contains traces of peanuts.


4. Regulatory Non-Compliance

Products must meet various national and international safety, quality, and environmental standards. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in mandatory recalls. Reasons include:

  • Use of Banned Substances: Some chemicals or materials are prohibited in certain countries. Products containing these substances must be recalled.

  • Failure to Meet Safety Standards: Products that do not pass safety tests (e.g., flammability, crashworthiness) are often recalled.

  • Lack of Proper Certification: Products sold without required certifications or approvals (e.g., FDA approval for medical devices) may be subject to recall.

Case Example:

In 2018, several children’s toys were recalled in the European Union for containing excessive levels of phthalates, a group of chemicals banned in children’s products.


5. Packaging and Tampering Issues

Packaging plays a vital role in protecting products from contamination and tampering. Recalls may occur if:

  • Packaging Fails: Broken seals, leaking containers, or compromised packaging can expose products to contamination or spoilage.

  • Evidence of Tampering: If there is any indication that a product has been tampered with after leaving the manufacturer, a recall may be issued to prevent harm.

Case Example:

In the 1980s, Tylenol capsules were recalled after tampering incidents in which cyanide-laced capsules led to several deaths. This event led to widespread changes in packaging standards.


6. Supply Chain and Quality Control Failures

Global supply chains can introduce risks if suppliers do not adhere to the same quality and safety standards as manufacturers. Issues include:

  • Substandard Materials: Use of inferior or counterfeit components can compromise product safety.

  • Inconsistent Quality Control: Lack of rigorous testing and oversight can allow defective products to reach consumers.

Case Example:

The 2007 recall of millions of toys by Mattel was linked to lead paint used by a subcontractor in China, highlighting the importance of supply chain oversight.


7. Software and Technology Defects

With the rise of smart products and connected devices, software glitches and cybersecurity vulnerabilities have become new reasons for recalls. Examples include:

  • Firmware Bugs: Faulty software in cars, medical devices, or electronics can cause malfunctions.

  • Security Risks: Devices with vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers may be recalled to protect user data and safety.

Case Example:

In 2015, Fiat Chrysler recalled 1.4 million vehicles after researchers demonstrated they could remotely hack into the car’s control systems.


Conclusion

Product recalls are a vital mechanism for protecting consumers from harm and maintaining trust in the marketplace. The reasons for recalls are varied-ranging from safety hazards and contamination to labeling errors, regulatory non-compliance, packaging failures, supply chain issues, and technology defects. While recalls can be costly and damaging to a company’s reputation, they are essential for upholding product safety standards. By understanding the causes of recalls, manufacturers can implement better quality control, regulatory compliance, and risk management practices, ultimately ensuring safer products for everyone.

Please fill the required fields*