More Filters

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer North Carolina

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer North Carolina

Janet Ward Black

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Attorney Janet Ward Black is the principal owner of Ward Black Law located in Greensboro. It is one of the largest woman-owned law firms in our state. The firm’s clients have received settlements of more than $100 million over the last 10 years. The firm represents people injured at work, in accidents, and by dangerous products and environmental hazards across North Carolina.

A graduate of Davidson College cum laude in economics and Duke Law School, Black served as the third woman president of the North Carolina Association of Trial Lawyers and the fourth woman president of the North Carolina Bar Association. She was the second lawyer in history to serve as president of both organizations.

The program she created while president of the 16,000 member Bar Association, “4 ALL,” has been used as a model in the United States and Canada for providing free legal services to the poor. The 4ALL program included a telephone call-in day during which more than a thousand NC lawyers provided free legal advice to any person who called a central toll-free number. More than 7000 people consulted with a lawyer that day. Over 100,000 North Carolinians have been assisted by a North Carolina lawyer at no charge since “4 ALL” began.

Benjamin Cochran

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Managing partner Benjamin T. Cochran oversees the operation of Hardison & Cochran Attorneys at Law in addition to representing individual clients in cases involving workers’ compensation and personal injury law.

A lifelong North Carolinian, Cochran knew from his high-school days in High Point that he wanted to be an attorney. He received a B.A. degree in economics and African-American studies from the University of North Carolina in 1999 and then enrolled at the Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law at Campbell University.

As a second-year law student, Cochran started working part-time in the law firm he now manages. During his third year in law school, he was actively handling some aspects of trial work for the firm and then joined as a licensed attorney after getting his J.D. and passing the bar in 2002.

For the first eight years, Cochran concentrated his work exclusively on workers’ compensation issues. He obtained additional training in workers’ compensation law and received designation as a Board Certified Specialist in Workers’ Compensation by the North Carolina State Bar. In recent years, Cochran has expanded his practice to include personal injury cases, but workers’ compensation remains his primary focus.

Jon R. Moore

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Jon Moore grew up in the Kansas City, Missouri area where he earned his Eagle Scout badge and graduated as valedictorian of his high school class of 600. He attended college at Northwestern University, outside of Chicago. Following college, Jon got accepted to Georgetown University Law School but elected to defer his acceptance for a year. During that year, Jon returned to his hometown and taught English and Debate at a local high school. Jon continued to pursue his interest in teaching while at law school, by teaching a practical law class to students at a high school in Washington, DC.

Jon and Laura moved to Charlotte in 2002 when Laura accepted a position as a reporter at a Charlotte TV station. It was at that time that Jon began his legal career in North Carolina. Jon has been recognized by North Carolina Super Lawyers® magazine every year from 2012 through 2024. He currently serves in the capacity of PAC Chair for the North Carolina Advocates for Justice, and has previously served as Vice President of Legislative Affairs for the North Carolina Advocates for Justice, Vice-President of Legal Affairs, Chair of the Auto Torts and Premises Liability section, and Chair of the Products Liability section.

Jamie Teague

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Associate Attorney Jamie Teague is an integral part of the Powers Law Firm PA, bringing a wealth of knowledge and a compassionate approach to criminal defense, particularly in cases involving domestic violence and their interplay with family-related legal matters.

Within her practice, Jamie focuses on a broad spectrum of family law issues, including but not limited to legal separation, divorce, child custody, child support, alimony, post-separation support, and equitable distribution.

Her legal help and guidance are particularly crucial in cases where family law matters intersect with criminal allegations, such as domestic violence charges and DVPO – Domestic Violence Protective Orders (50B Orders in NC).

Jamie understands the profound impact criminal domestic violence allegations can have on family law outcomes and can bridge the gap between civil family law proceedings and the criminal justice sphere.

Phil Weinberg

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Being charged with a criminal offense is serious matter. The consequences of a criminal conviction — no matter how seemingly minor — can be serious and long lasting.  Generally, no one is looking out for your legal interests in a criminal case except your defense attorney. Your defense attorney’s entire job is to safeguard your interests and protect you from the overwhelming power of the government that is investigating and prosecuting you. I have been told many times that I saved people from very tough legal dilemmas and did “a stunning job” defending them. I continuously research the latest cases, legal treatises, scientific literature, and articles on the subject of drunk driving defense, allowing me to be on the cutting edge of Assault and DV (Domestic Violence) and DUI defense at all times. Most of my practice primarily  focusses on defending those accused of Domestic Violence Assault charges.

 

Also, and very importantly, I take a holistic approach to every client, as each person and their case and history is different and unique, and as every client has different legal goals.  I know how to read a police report to find issues to help your case, and how to best present you and your case in court and to the prosecutor.

I have been practicing law in the Seattle-Everett-Tacoma area since 1986, with over 26 years of experience in criminal defense and DUI defense. I am a member in good standing with the Washington State Bar Association and belong to several professional associations. I have also been a member of the Washington State Trial Lawyers Association, Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers the American Trial Lawyers Association, the American Bar Association and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers…

Kirk Bernard

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Kirk Bernard has been a civil litigator in Washington & California for over 30 years, specializing in personal injury cases representing accident victims. For the past 39 years, Kirk has not stopped giving everything he has in the pursuit of justice.

Kirk Bernard received his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of California at Santa Barbara. Following graduation from Law School in 1981, Kirk quickly became a licensed personal injury attorney. Since then, he has dedicated himself to serving his community by giving victims a chance to fight back.

Kirk has represented accident victims on his own as well as partnering with other notable attorneys to fight major corporations. As a result of his relentless pursuit of justice, he has helped his clients recover millions of dollars. Kirk is a successful personal injury lawyer with a distinguished career who subsequently believes in community support. Due to his legal success, Kirk is able to give back to his community in a proactive and caring way.

His record shows that difficult fights don’t scare him because he is willing to fight for what is right. As long as you have someone like Kirk standing by your side, justice will be served.

Spencer Parr

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Spencer Parr is admitted to practice law in the federal courts as well as the state of Washington. Before co-founding Washington Law Center, he served in the U.S. Army with Military Intelligence as an electronic warfare operator and Russian linguistics. Spencer earned a bachelors degree in Political Science and International Studies before attending and graduating from UCLA School of Law in 2004. After earning his education, he worked as a Managing Attorney and Department Head for one of the largest consumer law firms in Washington state. He has litigated major issues in the law, represented clients from coast to coast, and dedicated his professional life to assisting the injured and disabled.

Spencer practices primarily in the areas of Workers’ Compensation and Personal Injury matters including medical malpractice cases.

Spencer’s Personal Career Recoveries are over $150,000,000 on behalf of Personal Injury, Workers’ Compensation, and Social Security Disability recipients, including:

$25,500,000 – Workplace Injury Claim
Record setting lump sum settlement plus lifetime care and pension.  Believed to be the largest recovery in its jurisdiction.

$2,177,000 – Industrial Injury Pension for a 51-Year Old Man who Suffered Physical and Mental Health Injuries
Injury pension paid at nearly $60,000 (inflation adjusting) per year for a client with significant physical and mental health injuries.

$1,900,000 – Injury Pension for Physical and Mental Health Impairments
Injury pension paid at nearly $60,000 per year for a client with significant physical and mental health impairments.

$1,886,000 – Industrial Injury Pension for a 53-Year Old Man who Suffered Physical and Mental Health Injuries
Injury pension paid at nearly $60,000 (inflation adjusting) per year for a client with significant physical and mental health injuries.

$1,825,000 – Industrial Injury Pension for a 38-Year Old Man who Suffered Physical and Mental Health Injuries
Injury pension paid at nearly $40,000 (inflation adjusting) per year for a client with significant physical and mental health injuries.

 

Derek Michael Smith

Defective Drug Recalls Lawyer

Derek brings more than 15 years of criminal law experience to the Tacoma attorney team of Smith and White. His work as a prosecutor, judge, and defense attorney provide him valuable insight into Washington criminal defense law.

Derek tried hundreds of criminal defense cases, including in the state Court of Appeals and Washington State Supreme Court, as a prosecutor with the cities of Seattle and Kent. He’s worked on or negotiated more than 15,000 trial experience, Derek has taken more than 150 jury trials to a verdict.

Derek served as the head of the domestic violence unit for the City of Kent and supervised the misdemeanor unit before he left to go to Seattle. In Seattle he served in the DUI and misdemeanor trial unit. There he prosecuted notorious strip club owner and alleged mob boss Frank Colacurcio for sexual assault on a waitress in his strip club and twice convicted him. After serving in the trial unit, Derek became the vice and narcotics liaison for the Seattle City Attorney’s Office and received the Seattle Police Department Chief’s Award for his role in Operation Sobering Thought. He has also presided over thousands of cases as a judge pro tem in Federal Way, Pacific and Des Moines.

He graduated with honors from Seattle University School of Law in 1996.

Derek volunteers his time to local nonprofits including serving as president of the Tacoma Art Museum Activities Council in 2010 for the Tacoma Art Museum’s 75th Anniversary Gala. He is the current vice president of St. Mark’s Lutheran by the Narrows church council.

Who is responsible for drug recalls?

Drug recalls are a critical aspect of public health protection, ensuring that unsafe or defective medications are swiftly removed from the market to prevent harm to patients. When a drug is found to be potentially dangerous, contaminated, mislabeled, or otherwise not in compliance with regulatory standards, a recall may be initiated. But who bears the responsibility for initiating, managing, and overseeing these recalls? The answer involves a coordinated effort among manufacturers, regulatory authorities, and, in some cases, distributors and healthcare providers.

The Manufacturer: The First Line of Responsibility

The primary responsibility for drug recalls lies with the manufacturer or the marketing authorization holder (licensee). These entities are directly involved in the production, packaging, and distribution of pharmaceutical products and are thus best positioned to identify and address issues with their products.

Manufacturers are required by law in most countries to have robust quality control and pharmacovigilance systems in place. These systems are designed to detect problems such as contamination, incorrect labeling, or unexpected side effects. If a manufacturer discovers a problem-either through internal quality checks, consumer complaints, or reports from healthcare providers-they are obligated to assess the risk and, if necessary, initiate a recall.

Manufacturers must also have a recall plan ready, detailing how they will communicate with distributors, healthcare providers, regulators, and, if needed, the public. They are responsible for tracking the distribution of affected batches, retrieving the product from the market, and ensuring safe disposal or correction of the issue.

Regulatory Authorities: Oversight and Enforcement

While manufacturers are the first to act, regulatory authorities play a crucial oversight and enforcement role in drug recalls. Agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the UK, and the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) in India, among others, have the legal power to monitor drug safety and enforce recalls when necessary.

Regulatory agencies may become aware of potential drug issues through adverse event reporting systems, routine inspections, or whistleblower reports. If they determine that a drug poses a significant risk to public health, they can request or mandate a recall, even if the manufacturer has not acted voluntarily.

Once a recall is underway, regulators oversee the process to ensure it is effective and comprehensive. They may require the manufacturer to submit regular progress reports, conduct effectiveness checks, and provide evidence that the recalled product has been removed from all levels of the supply chain. In cases where the manufacturer fails to comply, regulatory authorities can impose penalties, suspend licenses, or take legal action.

Distributors, Wholesalers, and Healthcare Providers

The responsibility for drug recalls does not end with manufacturers and regulators. Distributors, wholesalers, pharmacies, and healthcare providers also play important roles in the recall process. When notified of a recall, these stakeholders must act quickly to remove the affected product from their shelves and inform patients who may have received the medication.

In some jurisdictions, distributors and importers are legally required to cooperate with recall efforts, maintain accurate records of product distribution, and assist in tracing and retrieving recalled products. Healthcare providers, especially those in hospitals and clinics, are responsible for identifying patients who may have been exposed to the recalled drug and advising them on appropriate actions.

The Recall Process: Step by Step

  1. Detection of a Problem: Issues may be identified through internal quality checks, consumer complaints, adverse event reports, or regulatory inspections.

  2. Risk Assessment: The manufacturer assesses the severity of the problem and consults with regulatory authorities to determine the appropriate recall classification (e.g., Class I, II, or III in the U.S., based on the level of risk).

  3. Notification: The manufacturer notifies regulatory authorities, distributors, healthcare providers, and, if necessary, the public.

  4. Product Removal: Affected products are removed from the market at all levels of the supply chain. The manufacturer coordinates the logistics of retrieval and safe disposal.

  5. Regulatory Oversight: Authorities monitor the recall’s progress, require status reports, and may conduct effectiveness checks.

  6. Follow-up: After the recall, the manufacturer investigates the root cause of the issue and implements corrective actions to prevent recurrence.

Legal and Ethical Implications

Drug recalls are not just a matter of regulatory compliance-they are also a moral and ethical obligation. Failure to act promptly and transparently can result in serious harm to patients, loss of public trust, and severe legal consequences for companies and individuals involved.

Regulatory agencies have the authority to impose fines, suspend or revoke licenses, and pursue criminal charges in cases of gross negligence or intentional wrongdoing. Companies with poor recall records may also face reputational damage and increased scrutiny of their future products.

Conclusion

In summary, the responsibility for drug recalls is a shared one, involving manufacturers, regulatory authorities, distributors, and healthcare providers. The manufacturer or licensee bears the initial and primary responsibility for detecting problems and initiating recalls, while regulatory authorities provide oversight, enforce compliance, and protect public health. Distributors and healthcare providers play supporting roles in ensuring that recalled products are swiftly removed from circulation and that patients are informed and protected.

Ultimately, effective drug recalls depend on timely action, transparent communication, and a commitment to patient safety from all parties involved.

Please fill the required fields*