Best Criminal Lawyer in Cuyahoga County, OH

NOUVELLE GONZALO, ESQ.

Criminal Lawyer

Nouvelle L. Gonzalo, Esq. is a U.S. and international corporate lawyer who works with companies across the globe. She is the managing attorney of Gonzalo Law LLC, a U.S. and international corporate law firm with offices in Florida and Ohio. In addition to the active practice of law, she has served as adjunct faculty of international corporate law at the University of Florida, Levin College of Law for three years. She was recognized as a rising star by the national organization, Super Lawyers, in 2019 and 2020. Her practice areas include: international corporate law, intellectual property law, and nonprofit law.

Education

  • The Ohio State University, J.D. with Honors, 2009.
  • University of Oxford, St Anne’s College, Visiting Scholar, 2008.
  • New York University, B.A., Magna Cum Laude, 2004.

ADMISSIONS

  • Bar Admission to the State of Ohio, 2010
    S. Dist. Ct. N. Dist. of Ohio
  • Bar Admission to the State of Florida, 2015.
  • Ohio Notary Public Commission
  • Florida Notary Public Commission

Aaron A. Schwartz

Criminal Lawyer

A graduate of The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, Adam joined our firm in August 2014 immediately after taking the July 2014 Ohio Bar Examination. A native Clevelander, Adam’s passion has always been criminal defense and was thrilled when given the opportunity to return home to practice law alongside the knowledgeable and experienced lawyers at our firm.⁣

Adam concentrates his practice on criminal trials, appeals, civil litigation, as well as individuals and entities that are under investigation by a government or regulatory agency. Adam has defended companies and individuals in criminal and civil actions, as well as licensure actions before the Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court of Ohio, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness of the Supreme Court of Ohio, and most recently, the State Medical Board of Ohio and the State Pharmacy Board of Ohio.⁣

In the criminal law arena, Adam has experience handling a wide variety of cases throughout the State of Ohio including, but not limited to, aggravated murder, rape, sexual battery, felony and misdemeanor drug crimes, firearms offenses, escape, operating a vehicle while intoxicated, expungements, and many more.⁣

Inside and outside of the courtroom, Adam’s passion is to see that his clients receive every benefit of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel. He has represented and continues to represent, all of his clients with equal zeal regardless of the criminal or civil allegations against them.⁣

When he is not in the office or the courthouse, Adam enjoys running, golfing, boxing, playing the drums, trying new restaurants and attending concerts. Living in the heart of downtown Cleveland, Adam not only experiences Cleveland’s resurging social scene but also, Adam is always close to the office and courthouse in the event of a client emergency.

Aaron A. Schwartz

Criminal Lawyer

Aaron A. Schwartz is a dedicated and experienced criminal defense trial attorney. He graduated from Miami University in 1999 with a degree in Political Science and then attended the Case Western Reserve University School of Law earning his JD in 2002. Aaron began his career representing the accused in 2003 when he accepted a position at the Lake County Public Defender’s Office. Since 2003 Aaron has represented clients charged with crimes ranging from minor misdemeanors to first degree felonies. These offenses would include Domestic Violence, OVI, Drug Charges, Sex Offenses, Theft Offenses, Murder and others. Aaron has also been certified to handle death penalty cases in the state of Ohio.

Prior to joining Patituce & Associates in 2019 Aaron continued his legal career as both a solo practitioner and an associate attorney with Reitz, Paul & Shorr in Portage County. During that time he gained a wealth of experience in Domestic Relations, Juvenile Law, Probate and Civil Litigation.

Aaron is a lifelong resident of Northeast Ohio and resides on the East Side of Cleveland with his wife and two daughters.

Edward R. La Rue

Criminal Lawyer

Attorney Myron Watson has been in private practice for more than 20 years, specializing in criminal trial law, in both State and Federal Courts. In his legal practice, he has been involved in several high-profile criminal cases which received both local and national media attention. He is truly dedicated to his clients and will fight the tough legal battles to achieve the best result for his clients.

Attorney Myron Watson is a native Clevelander and a graduate of the East Cleveland School System. Being from this area, he knows the people and the legal terrain of this region well. He is a proud graduate of Cleveland State University, where he majored in Political Science. From there, he attended and graduated from Law School at Howard University in Washington, DC. After graduating from law school, he became an associate attorney at Willis Blackwell and Rogers before entering private practice.

Throughout his career, he has built a thriving practice and is recognized as one of the most respected criminal trial attorneys in Northeast Ohio. Many inside and outside the field of law consider Attorney Watson’s trial work outstanding. He is also involved in volunteer work for a number of civic organizations in the Greater Cleveland Area.

Steven Bradley

Criminal Lawyer

Ohio native and founding partner Steven Bradley is an Ohio Super Lawyer. Mr. Bradley is known throughout Northeast Ohio for his decisive courtroom victories in practice areas such as homicide, violent crimes, sex crimes, drug crimes and post-conviction. Since graduating from Cleveland-Marshall College of Law at Cleveland State University and entering the legal profession in 1990, Mr. Bradley has defended the freedom of countless people in Cleveland and throughout the State of Ohio.

Bar admissions

  • Ohio, 1990
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, 1991
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2000

Honors

  • Ohio Super Lawyer 2010 – 2016
  • Top 100 National Trial Lawyers

Education

  • J.D., Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, 1990
  • B.A./B.S., University of Toledo, 1987

Carolyn Kaye Ranke

Criminal Lawyer

Carolyn Kaye Ranke has 30 years of legal expertise and can handle your case. With experience on both side of the bench Carolyn Kaye Ranke will ensure you are represented to every extent the law allows. “Kaye” has vast career history spanning over 150 jury trials and is certified under Ohio Rule 30 for death penalty litigation. She has also been lead counsel in more than 15 aggravated murder trials.

EXPERIANCE

30 years of legal experience; active litigation and trial practice in all Federal, State and Municipal Courts; Both criminal and civil jury trial experience.

Currently Kaye is handling the representation of clients involved in custody or divorce proceedings, as well as clients charged with aggravated felonies or other crimes in both State and Federal courts.  Practice includes involvement in employment disputes and discrimination claims, including litigating claims before the EEOC and other administrative avenues.  Entire practice involves litigation and cases in various stages of trial preparation

Carolyn Kaye Ranke has a unique perspective having worked on both sides of the bench. She was previously appointed as a Judicial Magistrate.

Appointed Judicial Magistrate and Hearing Officer hearing private child custody cases and disputes; cases involving allegations of abuse, neglect and dependency of children by the Division of Children and Family Services; child support; and juvenile delinquency matters. Manage a high volume docket of approximately 450 cases in various stages of litigation and/or review.  As well as being a Jurist for Teen Drug Court.

Nicholas G. Haddad

Criminal Lawyer

Nicholas G. Haddad is a second generation attorney from Cleveland, Ohio. He is a graduate of Cleveland-Marshall College of Law and Mercyhurst University. As a criminal defense lawyer, Mr. Haddad is a true believer in the fact that all of his clients are “innocent until proven guilty”. No matter the odds, he uses all of his talents along with the full force of the law to prevent the government from taking away this fundamental right. He believes that everyone deserves to have a voice and have their day in court and when that day comes, no one will fight harder to protect your rights and when possible prove your innocence. His passion for justice and his determination to win make Nicholas G. Haddad the premier choice for all your criminal defense and legal needs. In addition to criminal defense. the firm has a substantial Family Law practice. Additionally, Mr. Haddad has successfully represented victims of truck accidents, car accidents and other personal injury clients recover millions of dollars for their injuries and expenses. 

Awards & Accolades

  • Ohio Super Lawyers, “Rising Star,” 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024

Associations

  • Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association
  • Cleveland Marshall Law Alumni Association, Life Member
  • Cleveland Criminal Defense Lawyers Association
  • Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Jason B. Mizak

Criminal Lawyer

Jason is a founding partner of Mizak and Pacetti, LLC. As counsel, he has advised clients in Ohio for 10 years through the complexities of civil litigation, adversarial probate matters, personal injury claims, negotiating operating agreements, leases, corporate documents, and other contracts.

Jason works closely with clients in developing estate plans, and preparing Wills, Trusts, Powers of Attorney, and Living Wills.

Practice Areas: 

Estate Administration and Planning, Business Law, Personal Injury, Civil Litigation, Family Law, Real Estate Law

Admissions: 

Ohio
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio

Memberships: 

Ohio State Bar Association

Education: 

Kent State University, 2003, Founder’s Scholar, Magna Cum Laude
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, 2006, Dean’s Scholar

What Tests Are Part of the Broader Standardized Field Sobriety Test?

Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) are a series of physical and cognitive assessments used by law enforcement officers to determine if a driver is impaired by alcohol or drugs. These tests were developed and validated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the 1970s and have since become a crucial tool in identifying and prosecuting impaired drivers across the United States.

The Three Primary Standardized Field Sobriety Tests

The broader SFST consists of three primary tests, each designed to evaluate different aspects of a person’s physical and mental coordination:

  1. Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test

The HGN test is based on the observation that alcohol and certain drugs can cause involuntary jerking of the eyes, known as nystagmus. During this test:

  • The officer holds a small object (often a pen or flashlight) about 12-15 inches from the subject’s face.
  • The subject is instructed to follow the object with their eyes without moving their head.
  • The officer moves the object smoothly from side to side, looking for three indicators of impairment: a) Lack of smooth pursuit b) Distinct nystagmus at maximum deviation c) Onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees
  1. Walk-and-Turn (WAT) Test

This test assesses a person’s ability to follow instructions and perform physical movements. The subject is required to:

  • Take nine heel-to-toe steps along a straight line
  • Turn on one foot
  • Return in the same manner in the opposite direction

The officer looks for eight potential indicators of impairment, including:

  • Inability to maintain balance while listening to instructions
  • Beginning before instructions are finished
  • Stopping while walking
  • Failure to touch heel-to-toe
  • Stepping off the line
  • Using arms for balance
  • Improper turn
  • Incorrect number of steps
  1. One-Leg Stand (OLS) Test

This test evaluates a person’s balance and coordination. The subject is instructed to:

  • Stand with one foot approximately six inches off the ground
  • Count aloud by thousands (One thousand-one, one thousand-two, etc.) until told to put the foot down

The officer looks for four main indicators of impairment:

  • Swaying while balancing
  • Using arms to balance
  • Hopping
  • Putting the foot down

Additional Tests and Observations

While the HGN, WAT, and OLS tests form the core of the Standardized Field Sobriety Test battery, officers may employ additional tests or make further observations to assess impairment:

  1. Preliminary Breath Test (PBT)

Although not part of the standardized tests, many jurisdictions allow officers to use portable breath testing devices to estimate a person’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC) in the field.

  1. Romberg Balance Test

This test requires the subject to stand with their feet together, head tilted back, eyes closed, and estimate the passage of 30 seconds.

  1. Finger-to-Nose Test

The subject is asked to touch the tip of their nose with the tip of their index finger while their eyes are closed.

  1. Alphabet Test

The subject may be asked to recite a portion of the alphabet or count backwards from a specific number.

  1. General Observations

Throughout the interaction, officers observe and document the subject’s overall appearance, behavior, and other signs of potential impairment, such as:

  • Slurred speech
  • Bloodshot or watery eyes
  • Odor of alcohol
  • Fumbling with license and registration
  • Difficulty exiting the vehicle

Significance and Limitations of SFSTs

The Standardized Field Sobriety Tests have been scientifically validated and are widely accepted in courts as evidence of impairment. However, it’s important to note their limitations:

  • False Positives: Certain medical conditions, injuries, or environmental factors can cause a person to perform poorly on these tests even when sober.
  • Subjectivity: While standardized, there is still an element of subjective interpretation by the officer administering the tests.
  • Limited Scope: SFSTs were primarily developed to detect alcohol impairment and may be less effective in identifying impairment from other substances.

Despite these limitations, SFSTs remain a valuable tool for law enforcement in combating impaired driving. They provide officers with a standardized method to establish probable cause for arrest and further chemical testing.

Conclusion

The Standardized Field Sobriety Tests consist primarily of the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus, Walk-and-Turn, and One-Leg Stand tests. These assessments, along with additional observations and sometimes supplementary tests, form a comprehensive approach to evaluating driver impairment in the field. While not perfect, these tests play a crucial role in identifying and removing impaired drivers from the roads, contributing to public safety efforts nationwide.

FAQ: Standardized Field Sobriety Tests

Q1: Are field sobriety tests mandatory?

A1: In most jurisdictions, field sobriety tests are voluntary. However, refusing to take them may still result in arrest if the officer has other reasons to suspect impairment.

Q2: Can medical conditions affect performance on field sobriety tests?

A2: Yes, various medical conditions, such as inner ear problems, leg or back injuries, and neurological disorders, can affect performance on these tests.

Q3: Do I have the right to consult an attorney before taking field sobriety tests?

A3: Generally, you do not have the right to consult an attorney before deciding whether to take field sobriety tests during a traffic stop.

Q4: Can field sobriety test results be challenged in court?

A4: Yes, the results can be challenged. Factors such as improper administration of the tests, environmental conditions, or the subject’s physical limitations can be used to contest the results.

Q5: Are field sobriety tests accurate for detecting drug impairment?

A5: While designed primarily for alcohol impairment, some aspects of SFSTs can indicate drug impairment. However, their accuracy may vary depending on the substance involved.

Q6: Can I pass a field sobriety test if I’m over the legal BAC limit?

A6: It’s possible to perform well on field sobriety tests even while over the legal limit, especially for individuals with high alcohol tolerance. Conversely, some people may perform poorly even when below the limit.

Q7: Are there alternatives to standardized field sobriety tests?

A7: Some jurisdictions use other tests or devices, such as portable breath tests or oral fluid tests. However, the three standardized tests remain the most widely accepted and validated methods.

Please fill the required fields*